Live Coverageof both South Carolina State Senate and House of Representative Assemblies.
Obama's Un-Disownable Preacher of Hate
Written by Michelle Malkin
May 07, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Barack Obama looked pale and wan at what he called his "big press conference" about the Rev.
Jeremiah Wright on Tuesday afternoon. Numb. Chastened. Defeated.
Extolled for his eloquence, Obama stuttered and stammered his way
through the question-and-answer session. It appeared he was having an
out-of-body experience.
Barack Obama looked pale and wan at what he called his "big press conference" about the Rev.
Jeremiah Wright on Tuesday afternoon. Numb. Chastened. Defeated.
Extolled for his eloquence, Obama stuttered and stammered his way
through the question-and-answer session. It appeared he was having an
out-of-body experience.
Who knew that the greatest threat to his presidential campaign would
come from the preacher who married him, baptized him and prayed with
him? Barack Obama should have known. That's who. Take that judgment and
shove it on a pretty campaign poster.
"Yes, we can"? Try "Yes, you should have."
For the past 24 hours, Obama's campaign too slowly grappled with how to
handle the aftermath of Wright's whirlwind tour of hatred this weekend
-- from Dallas, where he decried his "public crucifixion," to Detroit,
where he entertained NAACP bigwigs with impersonations of white people,
mockeries of classical music and "white" marching bands, and lectures
on racial brain theories, to the National Press Club, where he preened,
strutted and head-wagged his way through an hour of bitter black
liberation theologizing.
At first, Obama downplayed Wright's public appearances. But Obama now
tells us he had to wait 24 hours to convene a press conference to
denounce Wright's National Press Club speech because he "hadn't seen
it." After all this time on the campaign trail, we're back to the
Obama-as-clueless-naif narrative again. When he finally did view the
Washington speech, Obama explained, he was "shocked" and "outraged" and
"saddened" because "the person I saw was not the person that I'd come
to know over 20 years."
What a load of pure unadulterated horse manure. Anyone with eyes can
see that Wright's performances are finely honed, time-tested acts. His
anti-white, anti-American, "imperialist"-bashing shtick was not
developed overnight or over the past few years. He's been peddling AIDS
conspiracies for decades. He's been grievance-mongering about slavery
for decades. He's been flirting with the Nation of Islam, which
provided security for his speeches, for decades. He's been a shouting
left-wing radical for decades.
Obama's best-selling "Audacity of Hope" is named after the first sermon
of Wright's that he heard -- decades ago -- in which the pastor of
racial resentment inveighed against an environment "where white folks'
greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in
another hemisphere." Yet, only now has Obama concluded that Wright's
sermons are "a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in truth."
Welcome to the Jive Talk Express.
A reader of mine who is a clergyman e-mailed after Obama's press
conference: "As a pastor, I have this take: It is inconceivable that
Obama had no knowledge of Wright's views after 20 years as a member of
that church. As a pastor, my heart-held, deepest beliefs and passions
cannot be silenced. It is what I am. If I were given a microphone at
the National Press Club, I would not speak on something that I had
guardedly kept secret for most of my life. No, I would go to my main
point, the center of my ministry, the core of my passion, to speak
truth as I know it to be. How can Obama actually claim that this is
news from his pastor? His mailman, butcher or plumber? No problem. His
pastor? No way!"
It's not Wright who has changed his loony tune.
It was just last year that Obama was telling the Chicago Tribune that
Wright was his sounding board for truth: "What I value most about
Pastor Wright is not his day-to-day political advice. He's much more of
a sounding board for me to make sure that I am speaking as truthfully
about what I believe as possible and that I'm not losing myself in some
of the hype and hoopla and stress that's involved in national politics."
It was just this March, in his Philadelphia racial reconciliation
speech, that Obama was urging us not to dismiss Wright as a "crank or a
demagogue" and protesting that he could "no more disown him than I can
disown the black community."
Now, realizing how gravely his self-serving association with Wright has
wounded his campaign, Obama himself has attempted to do both those
things -- and expects the American public to believe him when he weakly
and belatedly asserts that "when I say I find [Wright's] statements
appalling, I mean it."
As those of us with non-European brains might put it: You be trippin', Barry.
--------------------------------------------
Michelle Malkin is author of "Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild." Her e-mail address is