- Does Our Life Style and Conversation Reflect Our Christian Profession
- Urgent Communication for the Attention and Action of All Sheriffs, Attorneys General, and Governors
- Arizona Today – Just for Today
- An Open Letter to Vladimir Putin and the Russian People - Revisited
- Evert’s Electables
- Local Elections Matter More Than You Believe
- SC Upstate Political Leader’s Repeated Use of Lawfare Backfires
- NC Attorney General Josh Stein’s 2020 Judicial Rebuke on Election Rules
- Massive Immigration Wave Waiting for Kamala Election
- Kamala Seriously Misrepresents 2024 Border Bill
- North Carolina Soros Alert
- CIVILIZATION’S INTERREGNUM – PART 15
- Christians Nationwide Unite in Prayer for Divine Intervention in Upcoming Election and 'Expect God's Help'
- Religion, Region, and Politics
- Oreshnik Hypersonic Russian Missile Strikes Ukraine
Henry Lamb
President Obama's Marxist Majority
A reporter asked Majority Leader Harry Reid how he could justify exempting Nebraska from Medicaid payments forever, in exchange for Sen. Ben Nelson's vote. His reply:
There's a hundred senators here. And I don't know if there's a senator that doesn't have something in this bill that was important to them. And if they don't have something in it important to them, then it doesn't speak well of them. That's what this legislation is all about. (Harry Reid, Dec. 21, 2009, Democratic press conference after cloture vote on health-care bill)
Democrats' Despicable Duplicity
- By Henry Lamb
Democrats insisted on changing the law in Massachusetts to require an election to fill the office of Sen. John Kerry, should he be elected president in 2004. They argued that the people, not the governor, should choose the senator's replacement. Of course, the governor at the time was a Republican, Mitt Romney. Now that the governor is a Democrat, the people should not choose Ted Kennedy's successor; the governor should make the appointment. The duplicity here is despicable.
Democrats went berserk over what they called President Bush's "power grab," but are silent in the face of President Obama's massive consolidation of power. The duplicity here is despicable.
Welcome to USSR, 1920
- By Henry Lamb
When the president announced last week that he would “cut out the middleman” and make direct government loans to students, he laid bare his contempt for free enterprise. He is fulfilling a campaign promise by overhauling the system through which he claims, “Private lenders are costing America’s taxpayers more than $15 million dollars every day and provide no additional value except to the banks themselves.”
Consider the philosophy behind his statement. If government cuts out the middleman and performs the service instead, it will be cheaper and more efficient, he reasons. Apply this same reasoning to, say, the entire banking industry. Government’s direct involvement in the banking industry can eliminate all those bonuses paid to greedy executives and profits earned by greedy share holders, and make sure that loans are extended to low-income borrowers whether they qualify or not. Direct government control of the banking business will surely make it fairer and more efficient.
Browse by the Top Tags ...
