Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- After “Political Spanking,” Ehlers Joins Hoard in Backing Joe Dill
- The Greenville GOP’s Candidate Kiss of Death Strikes Again
- The SC Freedom Caucus Becomes a Target in District 10
- “Farms That Grow Nothing” Served at the Republican Runoff Breakfast Table
- At First Monday, Timmons and Simpson Connect Washington Reform with South Carolina Soil
- Norman Picks Morgan for “Strong, Bold, Conservative Ticket”
- Joey Hudson Receives South Carolina’s Order of the Palmetto at Freedom Farm Fest
- Published by James Spurck
- Reddy and Wilson Pile on Norman as 3rd Televised GOP Debate Turns Personal
- Evert's Electables
- When the Liberty Bell Found Its True Voice
- SC Attorney General’s Race: Sparks Fly at SCETV, Substance Takes Center Stage at GCRW Luncheon
- Is Greenville County’s Next Administrator Already Here?
- The Iran War, the 14-Point Memorandum, and AIPAC
- Pakistan, the Iran War, and Regional Security
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

