Abiogenesis does not qualify as science largely because it does not meet any of the main qualifications to be considered science. It is not based on observation, in fact, it is contrary to observation. It is not repeatable because if it happened it is a one-off event in the past for which there is no actual information. Ultimately it doesn't qualify as science because it is fundamentally untestable. Not only because it cannot be observed but because even if it can be proven impossible here on Earth it can always possible to move it to some distant place and time that makes testing it impossible.
- Knowing Trump
- Newberry Judge Request Sworn Medical Affidavits and Sets Near-Term Deadline in Jeff Davis Case
- “If You’ve Never Had Filet Mignon, Peanut Butter Tastes Just Fine”
- Democrat-Turned-Republican Pascoe Makes Third Appearance Before Greenville County GOP
- Compromise Reached, But Public Trust Remains Unsettled After County Administrator Vote
- Hear or See Something? Say Something: Crime Stoppers of Greenville Marks Awareness Month
- Senate Property Tax Debate Expands as Bright Pushes Broader Relief Amendment
- Ukrainian Intelligence and the Ukraine War
- The Iranian Dilemma
- Republican Gubernatorial Candidates Outline Competing Visions at Upstate Women’s Forum
- Warrior For American Independence—The Story Of “ATAYATAGHRONGHTA” (Colonel Joseph Louis Cook)
- Greenland Defense and Arctic Economic Development
- Flat Earth, Round Earth, and the Bible’s Forgotten Clue
- MIS RAICES ESTAN AQUI!
- More Quotes on the Civil War
Conclusion on Reasons Abiogenesis cannot be Considered Science
- Details
- By Charles Creager, Jr.

