- Ten Toes In: Why Trump Accounts Make Sense for North Carolina's Small Businesses
- Remnant Called -
- Former Moms for Liberty Chairs in South Carolina Address Massive Departure from Organization
- Same Job. Two Résumés. Graham and Norman Make Their Case for the US Senate
- Back to Basics: Understanding Your Greenville County Property Tax Bill from Start to Finish
- AIPAC Lobbyists Grip on Congress
- The Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Wildberries
- Hunting Island's Lighthouse Was Built to Outsmart the Atlantic's Shifting Shoreline
- Turkish Naval Force Deploys in Eastern Mediterranean
- Briefing Notes from the Ukraine and Persian Gulf Wars
- Saudi Arabia’s Iran War Dilemma
- South Carolina Gas Tax Climbs From Near Bottom Nationally to 30th in 2026
- Invalid and Valid Iran-Vietnam Analogies
- Correcting Widespread Misconceptions about the Vietnam War
- 'Trapped Inside Myself' Explores One Man's Journey from Self-Destruction to Hope and Personal Transformation
Political
Your Rights Are At Stake
- Details
- By Eagle Forum
SCOTUS Decision Comes on Heels of Trump Decision Protecting Conscience Rights
This past Friday, June 12th the Trump Administration finalized a rule on Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act. Section 1557 prevents covered health programs from discrimination based on current civil rights statutes, like that in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Specifically, Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in some federally funded programs and was interpreted by the Obama Administration to include “termination of pregnancy and gender identity, which it defined as “one’s internal sense of gender, which may be male, female, neither, or a combination of male and female.”
High Court Assaults Liberty in Bizarre, Unfounded and Dangerous Employment Discrimination Case
- Details
- By Christian Newswire
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fl. -- Dr. Frank Wright, CEO and President of D. James Kennedy Ministries, released this statement in response to the U.S. Supreme Court's Title VII employment discrimination case—"Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia"—released Monday.
In an open assault on the rule of law and the role of America's elected legislators, six members of the U.S. Supreme Court redefined the plain meaning of the word "sex" to reach a bizarre, unfounded and dangerous conclusion in its employment discrimination ruling.
Supreme Court Rewrites Civil Rights Act
- Details
- By Tony Perkins - Family Research Council
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling last Monday that makes the nation's high court look more like a uber-legislative body than a judicial one. The Court declared that the federal prohibition of employment discrimination based on sex in the 1964 Civil Rights Act also prohibits discrimination on the basis of "sexual orientation" and "gender identity." In redefining the term that describes biological sex, the Supreme Court took the question of protected categories out of the hands of the American people and once again created judicial legislation.
SCOTUS Decision Will Harm Women and Girls
- Details
- By Eagle Forum
Last Monday morning, in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County that title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 extends to individuals identifying as gay or transgender. The majority position, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch stated:
“An individual’s homosexuality or transgender status is not relevant to employment decisions That’s because it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.”
Eagle Forum Commends RNC for Maintaining “Solid Grassroots” Platform
- Details
- By Eagle Forum
Eagle Forum, the conservative grassroots organization founded by Phyllis Schlafly in 1972, commends the Republican National Committee for maintaining the 2016 RNC Platform.
“Given the quarantine situation, we were concerned that decisions regarding the Platform not be made in proverbial smoke-filled rooms or through secret meetings in Washington, D.C. We sent a letter to the White House and RNC leadership earlier this week to express our concerns, particularly concerned in light of reports of that efforts were underway to replace the Platform with a one-page document written by D.C. insiders,” said Eagle Forum President Colleen Holcomb.
Libs Handcuff Police with Defund Cry
- Details
- By Tony Perkins - Family Research Council
The fringe Left: Great at making slogans. Terrible at considering consequences. Maybe "DEFUND THE POLICE" makes an edgy statement slathered in yellow letters on D.C.'s 16th Street -- but putting it on paper, like Democratic lawmakers are threatening to do, would be one of the worst policy mistakes in history. And it's not just Republicans who think so.
Legislation Ensures COVID-19 Taxpayer Funds Won’t Go to Abortion
- Details
- By Eagle Forum
A couple of weeks ago we reported that Planned Parenthood received $80 million in taxpayer dollars from the Paycheck Protection Program. This came on the heels of Speaker Nancy Pelosi's attempt to create a $1 billion funding stream for reimbursing laboratory costs that were exempt from the Hyde Amendment back in March. As you may recall, the Hyde Amendment prevents taxpayer money from being used to pay for abortions.
- Heavy Meddle: U.N. Blasts U.S. Governors on Life
- How the Law is Encouraging Marriage Fraud Across USA
- Tennessee Governor Bill Lee Ignores Victims of Police Brutality
- Missouri Administrative Court Ignores Dangerous Abortions, Orders St. Louis Planned Parenthood Relicensed
- Republicans Sue Pelosi Over Proxy Voting
- Dissenting from the Panic Attack
- Christian Medical Association Physicians Gain Support from Congress and States in Court Fight Against Discriminatory Firing
Browse by the Top Tags ...
