- Pakistan, the Iran War, and Regional Security
- The Iran War, the 14-Point Memorandum, and AIPAC
- When the Liberty Bell Found Its True Voice
- Back to Basics: Understanding Your Greenville County Property Tax Bill from Start to Finish
- Advocates for Faith & Freedom Files Election Integrity Lawsuit Seeking Answers from California Secretary of State
- The Republic of Türkiye and the Iran War
- American Independence and the Battle of Cowpens
- Turkish Naval Force Deploys in Eastern Mediterranean
- The Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Wildberries
- The $8 Billion that SC Lawmakers Don't Talk About
- Saudi Arabia’s Iran War Dilemma
- Update on the Trump Administration’s Robust and Rapid Delivery of Life-Saving U.S. Assistance to Venezuela
- Briefing Notes from the Ukraine and Persian Gulf Wars
- Greenville Republican Women's Monthly Luncheon - July 2026
- SCOTUS Ruling Allows Mail-In Ballots to Be Counted after Election Day
Political
Supreme Court Strikes Down “Egregious” Colorado Censorship Law
- Details
- By Eagle Forum
Today, the Supreme Court issued an opinion that removes the gag from the mouths of Christian counselors by upholding their First Amendment right to free speech.
This decision gives parents and children access to therapy that aligns with their personal and religious views. The Court struck down Colorado’s unconstitutional censorship law that prevented counselors from engaging in voluntary therapy that provides truthful information about bodily reality. The decision in Chiles v. Salazar reaffirms the important principle that counseling conversations are speech protected by the First Amendment. The Court’s 8-1 decision makes clear that “the First Amendment’s protections extend to licensed professionals much as they do everyone else.”
Cesar Chavez - A Saul Alinsky-Trained Thug Gets His Due
- Details
- By Tom DeWeese - American Policy Center
Sometimes it may take many years, but finally the lies are exposed, the halos crash to the ground and vindication is awarded to the truth tellers. Pardon me if I am feeling a bit of satisfaction from some shocking revelations – finally! Let me start with some details of personal events from years ago.
In the 1970s I was a dedicated activist of Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) the largest conservative youth activist group in the nation. I became state chairman of the Ohio branch. It was a time of major Leftist activity on college campuses, including antiwar demonstrations and violent riots. It was the beginning of the drive for the radical agenda we face today.
Mr. David Stumbo, candidate for Attorney General, and Mr. Fred West, candidate for Agriculture Commissioner, will address First Monday on Monday, April 13, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. in Greenville
- Details
- By Press Release
GREENVILLE, SC — First Monday is pleased to announce that Mr. David Stumbo, candidate for Attorney General, and Mr. Fred West, candidate for Agriculture Commissioner, will be our featured speakers at its meeting on Monday, April 13, 2026, at the Poinsett Club in downtown Greenville.
Both candidates will discuss the issues they believe the SC Attorney General and the Commissioner should address.
Their remarks will be followed by an interactive discussion, consistent with First Monday’s long-standing format that encourages dialogue between speakers and attendees.
Back-to-Basics Breakfast Brings a Plate Full of Legislative Bites
- Details
- By James Spurck, Publisher
County Chairman Blount outlines growth challenges, while Attorney General candidate Pascoe explains his path from Republican to Democrat and back again, and Rep. Burns calls for closing primaries
GREENVILLE COUNTY, SC — The latest Back-to-Basics Breakfast, hosted by the Palmetto Conservative Fund, served up a multi-layered look at the current state of governance in Greenville County and beyond, as local leadership, statewide candidates, and engaged citizens worked through a wide range of issues in real time. The format, which blends prepared remarks with open questioning, revealed not only policy priorities but also the underlying tensions that come with rapid growth, shifting political alignments, and competing expectations between government and the public.
Blount Serves Up County Realities and Growth Pressures
Greenville County Council Chairman Benton Blount opened the discussion by grounding the audience in the practical realities of county government. His remarks reflected both an effort to communicate recent accomplishments and an acknowledgment that many residents remain frustrated or confused about how county decisions affect their daily lives. Thanking the organizers and attendees, Blount emphasized the purpose of the event itself.
“This is a great event… I think it’s a great way to plug the public into what’s going on at all levels of government.”
Residency Lawsuit Against Greenville Councilman Ennis Fant Expands into Criminal Review Dispute
- Details
- By James Spurck, Publisher
Ongoing litigation now involves a SLED investigation, prosecutorial review, and state-level involvement
A March 25 hearing in Greenville County Court of Common Pleas brought the residency dispute involving Councilman Ennis Fant into sharper focus, as attorneys presented a series of motions tied to both the underlying claim and access to evidence.
According to information from those present in the courtroom, the hearing involved as many as nine separate motions that were argued between the plaintiff and multiple defendants, including Fant. The volume of motions reflects how the case has expanded beyond a single residency question into a broader legal contest over evidence, procedure, and the scope of the court’s review.
Arguments during the hearing addressed disputes over discovery, including efforts to obtain materials connected to the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigation into Fant’s residency, as well as records the plaintiff contends would help establish where Fant resides. Those records include bank documents, utility records, and information from the South Carolina Department of Revenue. Attorneys argued that some of those materials, including records reviewed by prosecutors, had not been produced, placing access to key evidence at the center of the dispute as the case moves forward.
Back to Basic Breakfast at Golden Corral with Mike Burns and Benton Blount
- Details
- By Palmetto Conservative Fund
Arizona’s Hidden Red Flag Law? Courts Accused of Secret Gun Confiscation Scheme
- Details
- By Catching Fire News
What if your rights could be taken… without a law ever being passed?
In this explosive interview, Kathleen Marquart sits down with Arizona activist Mike Palmer to uncover what he claims is a hidden red flag system operating through court rules—not legislation. Palmer argues that judges are bypassing lawmakers, using civil procedures to strip citizens of their firearms without due process or criminal charges.
From ex parte hearings and low evidentiary standards to real-world cases of alleged abuse, this conversation dives deep into how “red flag laws” may already exist where officials say they don’t—and what that could mean for property rights, constitutional protections, and the future of the Second Amendment.
- Greenville Republican Women Action Alert: SAVE America Act!
- Ask Your Senators to Support SAVE America Act
- Wilson – “We're going to be like Michael Jordan”
- Senator Hawley Introduces the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
- Eagle Forum Supports ‘Detransitioners’ On Detrans Awareness Day
- Feminists Push Extreme Causes in the Name of Women
- A Simple Question: Does the North Carolina Board of Elections have to Follow the North Carolina Constitution?
Browse by the Top Tags ...
